TWR vs MWR Comparison Calculator

This TWR vs MWR calculator compares time-weighted and money-weighted returns to show your behaviour gap: did the investment or your timing drive the result?

TWR vs MWR Comparison Calculator
%
%
Behaviour gap —
Time-weighted return —
Money-weighted return —

We always strive to use the latest data for every variable so our results and reports are as accurate as possible. Even so, errors are possible — you should not rely on this tool or its report alone, and we accept no liability for any decision made based on it.

What it does

This tool compares a time-weighted return (TWR) with a money-weighted return (MWR) and reports the behaviour gap between them. TWR measures the investment itself, while MWR measures what you actually earned given the timing of your deposits and withdrawals.

Data sources & parameters

This calculator uses standard financial formulas and runs entirely in your browser. It needs no external rate data — your result is computed only from the values you enter above.

We always strive to use the latest data for every variable so our results and reports are as accurate as possible. Even so, errors are possible — you should not rely on this tool or its report alone, and we accept no liability for any decision made based on it.

The formula

behaviour gap = TWR − MWR

How it works

Enter your portfolio's TWR and MWR. The tool subtracts one from the other to reveal the behaviour gap. A positive gap means TWR is higher than MWR, so cash-flow timing dragged on your result; a negative gap means your timing helped.

Where it is used

  • Judging whether an investment or a manager performed well, independent of your contributions
  • Measuring how much your own deposit and withdrawal timing helped or hurt
  • Explaining why your personal return differs from a fund's published figure

Worked example

A fund reports a time-weighted return of 12% while the investor's money-weighted return was only 9%. The behaviour gap of … shows that the timing of contributions cost about three percentage points of the return the fund itself delivered.

What the TWR vs MWR calculator does

You enter the time-weighted return (TWR) and the money-weighted return (MWR) of the same portfolio over the same period, and the calculator subtracts one from the other to give what is often called the behaviour gap: how much your timing of contributions and withdrawals helped or hurt, separate from the investment's own performance.

TWR shows how good the investment was; MWR shows how well you did. Confusing them is a common mistake when judging results, and side by side they split the outcome into its two causes.

Time-weighted return

Time-weighted return measures the compound growth of one unit of money left in the investment for the whole period, regardless of cash added or removed. It splits the timeline into sub-periods around each cash flow, calculates each sub-period's return, and chains them, which removes the influence of deposit and withdrawal timing.

A manager cannot control when you invest more or cash out, so TWR is the fair way to compare funds, managers, or strategies. Published performance figures, benchmark comparisons, and league tables are almost always time-weighted; a fund that "returned 12% last year" is quoting a time-weighted figure.

Money-weighted return

Money-weighted return is the single rate that reconciles all your cash flows with your ending balance, the definition of an internal rate of return. It weights each period by how much money you had invested, so a period with a large balance counts far more than one with almost nothing.

If you invested heavily just before a strong run, your MWR will be high, possibly well above the fund's TWR. If you put money in just before a slump, or sold near the bottom and missed the recovery, your MWR will trail the TWR badly even though the underlying investment did fine. MWR is the return your actual money earned.

Reading the behaviour gap

  • A positive gap means TWR is higher than MWR: the investment outperformed your personal result, and your timing cost you. This is the common case and the origin of the term; studies of real investors repeatedly find that average money-weighted returns lag the time-weighted returns of the funds people hold, because many buy after gains and sell after losses.
  • A negative gap means MWR is higher than TWR: you contributed more before gains or held back before losses, and your money did better than buy-and-hold would suggest.
  • A gap near zero means your cash flows had little net effect, typical of steady, regular contributions that neither chase nor flee the market.

Why the two returns diverge

A portfolio with no deposits or withdrawals after the first day shows identical TWR and MWR. Once cash moves in or out, the two can part ways, depending on whether changes in your invested balance coincide with strong or weak periods.

The size of the gap depends on how large the cash flows are relative to the balance and how much performance varied. Big contributions just before a volatile stretch can move MWR a long way from TWR; small, evenly spaced contributions into a smoothly rising market barely move it. That is why the same fund can leave two investors with very different personal returns over the same years.

Using the results

Use TWR to decide whether the investment is worth holding, comparing it with a relevant benchmark and alternatives. Use MWR to understand your own behaviour and the wealth you actually built.

A consistently large positive gap across several holdings suggests your timing, not your fund selection, needs fixing. Automate regular contributions, avoid reacting to headlines, and resist adding heavily after a rally or selling into a decline; a steady approach tends to shrink the gap toward zero.

Common mistakes

  • Comparing a fund's TWR with your own MWR and blaming the fund. The difference is your timing; judge the fund on TWR alone.
  • Assuming a positive gap means you chose bad investments. It usually means the investment did well and timing held your personal result back.
  • Ignoring the size of cash flows. A tiny deposit cannot create a large gap; only meaningful movements of money relative to the balance can.

Most investors who close their behaviour gap do it by becoming steadier in their own conduct, not by getting smarter about markets.

This article is general information only and is not financial advice.

About This TWR vs MWR Calculator

Use this TWR vs MWR calculator to get an instant estimate based on the figures you enter. Adjust the inputs above to match your situation, or browse all our calculators to plan your next step.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between TWR and MWR?
Time-weighted return (TWR) measures the performance of the investment itself, ignoring when you added or withdrew money. Money-weighted return (MWR), also called the internal rate of return, reflects what you personally earned, including the timing and size of every cash flow. TWR judges the fund or manager; MWR judges your experience as the investor.
What does the behaviour gap tell me?
The behaviour gap is TWR minus MWR. A positive gap means the investment did better than you did, so the timing of your deposits and withdrawals cost you return. A negative gap means your timing helped. A gap near zero means your cash flows had little net effect.
Which return should I use to compare funds?
Use TWR. Because it strips out the effect of your personal cash flows, it lets you compare one fund or strategy against another on a like-for-like basis. Published fund returns are almost always time-weighted for this reason.
Which return reflects what I actually earned?
MWR reflects your personal result. If you added a large amount just before a strong period, your MWR will beat the fund's TWR; if you added money just before a fall, your MWR will lag. It shows how your actual money performed.
Can the behaviour gap be negative?
Yes. A negative gap means your MWR was higher than the TWR, so your timing added value. This happens when you contributed more before gains or less before losses.
Is my data kept private?
Yes. The calculation runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is uploaded, stored, or shared with anyone.

About the author

Taha Kheirandish

Written and reviewed by

Taha Kheirandish

Economics student and independent researcher

Taha Kheirandish reads tax codes the way other people read maps — to find out where a system actually leads, not where it claims to go.

He is an economics student, and his work here is comparative by design. A pension deferral bonus in Quebec, a commuting allowance in Germany, a rent-increase ceiling in the Netherlands: each is a decision a government made about how money should move, and each reads differently once you set it beside eight others. He builds and checks these calculators across nine markets from primary sources — the regulation rather than a summary of it, the ministry’s own circular rather than a news item quoting it.

That is the editorial standard of the site as well as his habit. Every rate, threshold and bracket here carries the document it was read from and the date it takes effect, and gets re-checked when the law moves rather than when someone happens to notice.

He is a researcher, not a licensed adviser, and nothing on this site is personal financial advice. It is arithmetic done carefully with its sources shown — so that you can check it, and take it to someone who is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *