SMSF vs Industry Fund Cost Calculator Australia
This SMSF vs industry fund cost calculator compares an SMSF's fixed running cost with an industry fund's percentage fee to find the break-even super balance.

What it does
The SMSF vs Industry Fund Cost Calculator compares the fixed annual cost of running a self-managed super fund against an industry or retail fund's percentage fee on the same balance, and shows the balance at which they cost the same.
Data sources & parameters
This calculator uses standard financial formulas and runs entirely in your browser. It needs no external rate data — your result is computed only from the values you enter above.
We always strive to use the latest data for every variable so our results and reports are as accurate as possible. Even so, errors are possible — you should not rely on this tool or its report alone, and we accept no liability for any decision made based on it.
The formula
Industry fund cost = balance × fee% ÷ 100; break-even balance = SMSF cost ÷ (fee% ÷ 100)
How it works
It works out the industry fund's fee as a percentage of your balance, subtracts the SMSF's fixed running cost to show which is cheaper, and divides the SMSF cost by the fee rate to find the break-even balance.
Where it is used
- Comparing SMSF and industry fund costs on your balance
- Finding the break-even balance for an SMSF
- Deciding whether an SMSF is cost-effective yet
Worked example
On a A$300,000.00 balance, an industry fund charging 0.7% costs … a year — … versus a A$3,000.00 SMSF. The two break even at ….
What the SMSF vs industry fund cost calculator does
The smsf vs industry fund cost calculator puts two very different fee structures side by side. A self-managed super fund charges you a largely fixed dollar amount each year to run, regardless of how big the fund is. An industry or retail fund charges a percentage of your balance, so the dollar cost rises as your savings grow.
The tool converts the industry fund's percentage into a dollar figure for your balance, compares it against your SMSF running cost, and works out the break-even balance where the two are equal. That turns a hard-to-picture trade-off into three clear numbers you can act on.
Fixed cost versus percentage fee
The core of the comparison is the difference between a fixed cost and a percentage fee.
An SMSF's running cost is dominated by fixed items: annual accounting and tax work, the compulsory independent audit, and regulatory levies. These do not change much whether your balance is modest or large, so as a share of the fund they shrink as the balance grows.
An industry or retail fund typically charges a percentage of your balance. On a small balance that percentage is a small dollar amount, which is why pooled funds are usually cheaper for people starting out. But because the fee is a percentage, it keeps rising in dollar terms as the balance grows, even though the underlying service may be much the same.
This is why the balance is the input that decides the outcome. At a low balance the percentage fee is small and the fixed SMSF cost looks expensive. At a high balance the percentage fee can dwarf the fixed cost, and the SMSF becomes the cheaper structure.
How the calculation works
The maths is deliberately simple so you can trust and re-run it:
- The industry fund cost is your balance multiplied by the fee percentage.
- The cost difference subtracts the SMSF running cost from that industry fund cost, so a negative figure means the SMSF is dearer and a positive figure means it is cheaper.
- The break-even balance divides the SMSF running cost by the fee rate, giving the balance at which both structures cost the same.
Each figure updates instantly as you change an input, so you can quickly test how a different fee percentage or a higher running cost would move the break-even point.
Reading your result
The primary figure is the cost difference, framed as the industry fund cost minus the SMSF cost. When it is negative, the industry fund is cheaper at your current balance. When it is positive, the SMSF wins on cost. The size of the number tells you how much is at stake each year.
The industry fund cost shows the annual dollar fee for the pooled fund on your balance, which is often larger than people expect once a percentage is turned into dollars. The break-even balance is the headline strategic number: it tells you roughly how much you would need in super before an SMSF starts to look cost-competitive on fees alone.
What you need to enter
Three inputs drive the comparison:
- Your total super balance.
- The fixed annual running cost of the SMSF.
- The industry or retail fund's fee, expressed as a percentage.
For the SMSF running cost, gather quotes for accounting, audit, and administration so the figure reflects your likely real cost rather than a guess. For the fund fee, check your current fund's product disclosure statement or annual statement, and be careful to use the percentage that applies to your balance, since some funds combine a percentage fee with a flat administration fee.
Cost is not the whole decision
A cost comparison is a starting point, not a verdict. An SMSF gives you control over investments and strategy, but it also makes you responsible for compliance, record-keeping, the annual audit, and the fund's investment performance. Those responsibilities carry time and risk that a percentage fee in a pooled fund effectively pays someone else to handle.
There are also costs this tool deliberately leaves out, such as one-off setup fees, wind-up costs, and any investment-specific expenses, because they vary widely and would blur the core fixed-versus-percentage comparison. Treat the result as the cost side of the ledger, then weigh control, effort, insurance, and investment options separately, ideally with licensed advice, before deciding on a structure.
When to use this tool
This calculator is useful whenever the cost of your super structure is in question. Reach for it when you want to:
- See whether your balance has grown enough for an SMSF to be cost-competitive.
- Compare a specific SMSF quote against your current fund's fee.
- Find the break-even balance so you know what target to watch for.
- Sanity-check a claim that an SMSF is cheaper than a pooled fund.
Re-running the numbers as your balance grows or as fees change keeps the comparison current, so you can time any decision around the point where the cost genuinely tips in favour of one structure over the other.
Watching the break-even point over time
The break-even balance is not a fixed target; it moves whenever your SMSF running cost or the fund's fee changes. If accounting or audit costs rise, the break-even balance climbs, meaning you need more in super before an SMSF pays off. If a pooled fund lifts its percentage fee, the break-even balance falls, and an SMSF becomes attractive sooner. Checking the figure once a year keeps you aware of which way the trade-off is drifting.
It is also worth thinking about the direction of travel. Someone whose balance is still growing steadily toward the break-even point may be close to the moment an SMSF becomes cost-effective, while someone drawing down in retirement could see the balance move back below break-even over time. Pairing this cost view with your longer-term contribution and drawdown plans gives a fuller picture than a single snapshot, and it stops a decision that looks right today from quietly becoming the wrong one a few years later.
This is general information only and not financial advice.
About This SMSF vs Industry Fund Cost Calculator
Use this SMSF vs industry fund cost calculator to get an instant estimate based on the figures you enter. Adjust the inputs above to match your situation, or browse all our calculators to plan your next step.
